Isn’t Reviewing Papers My Boss’ Job?

Dear Dora: Reviewing papersDear Dora,

My PI asked me to start reviewing papers that are sent to him by journals- is this allowed? Isn’t that part of his job?!

– Suspicious in San Fran, Grad student

.

Dear Suspicious in San Fran,

Reviewing papers is part of your PI’s job. The way the review process works is that the editor of the journal asks your PI to review a paper, but the authors of the paper do not know who the reviewers are. This way, the journal protects the identities of the reviewers, so they can be open in their critiques. So, if you review the paper for your PI, and he submits it, the authors will not know whether it was a professor or a student who wrote it.

That being said, reviewing papers is good training, and some students even consider it an honor. It can be actually be quite exciting to read what others have shown, even before it is published. Some professors consider reviews essential for their students’ training, because it will help the students to learn from other groups, and to identify shortcomings in the manuscript. Most professors will read your critique and make necessary changes before submitting it to the journal.

What you need to think about, is whether your boss PI has passed these papers onto you for your own benefit, or to decrease his own workload. If the papers are related to your work, then writing the critique could be good practice for your own research. On the other hand, if the papers are not related to your work, or if he gives you papers frequently, then you have good reason to be suspicious. Try to find out whether others in the group review papers regularly, and if so, how they go about writing the critique and setting limits with your boss.

My recommendation is to evaluate how much extra work this creates for you and how much you benefit from it. If the workload becomes too difficult to handle, then it is time to politely refuse his requests. Of course, it can be challenge to stand up to your boss, especially when you are in graduate school. To increase your chances of getting your message through in a positive way, pick a time when he is not too busy. Then you can calmly approach him and say something like:

“I wanted to talk to you about the paper you just gave to me by Smith et al. It is the third review you asked me to write in the last few weeks. As you probably know, reviewing papers takes a lot of time, and it definitely slows down my work. I do not mind reviewing papers once in a while, but I would like to focus on my research now.” If you think it is appropriate, you can suggest a reasonable frequency for writing reviews.

Another option is to turn down the papers as he hands them to you, and give a reasonable explanation. “Unfortunately, I do not think I will have time to review this paper. I have so many plates/proteins/bacteria etc. to analyze in the next few weeks that I will probably not get around it.”

As I mentioned in my column two weeks ago, practicing the art of saying “No”, is a skill that can come in quite handy in graduate school!

In any event, it is important to let your boss know how you feel about reviewing papers. He might think that it is good training for you. Once you explain to him how you feel, he will hopefully be more reasonable in his requests, and let you focus on your work.

Dora Farkas, Ph.D. is the author “The Smart Way to Your Ph.D.:200 Secrets from 100 Graduates,” and the founder of PhDNet, an online community for graduate students and PhDs. You will find links to her book, monthly newsletters, and discussion board on her site. Send your questions to [email protected] and keep an eye out for them in an upcoming issue!

.

Stay tuned for the next Dear Dora in two weeks!  In the meantime, check a few of Dora’s recent posts:

.

Submit your questions to Dora at [email protected], or use the comment box below!


14 comments so far. Join The Discussion

  1. Rich

    wrote on April 15, 2010 at 7:14 am

    There is an additional ethical question here. When a potential reviewer is sent a request to review, that request is accompanied by a requirement that the reviewer not share the contents of the submitted manuscript with anyone else. Therefore, if a PI passes off a review to a grad student, they are breaching ethical protocols. The appropriate action for a PI to take is to deny the request for review and suggest the grad student as a potential reviewer (it is standard to practice to suggest alternative reviewers when you decide not to peer review an MS). This also elevates the grad student from a position of slave/work-hourse of the PI to colleague who is capable of doing the review him/her-self. Special arrangements can be made with journal editors to permit the PI to read over the grad student’s review prior to submission.

    And, if you’re wondering whether this actually happens, my PI did this for me in grad school.

  2. Dear Dora: How to Leave, Balance and Publish | BenchFly Blog

    wrote on May 13, 2010 at 11:38 am

    […] Isn’t Reviewing Papers My Boss’ Job? […]

  3. Dear Dora: My Labmates Want Me to Be Their Dealer | BenchFly Blog

    wrote on May 13, 2010 at 11:41 am

    […] Isn’t Reviewing Papers My Boss’ Job? […]

  4. Dear Dora: Is Working for a Competitor a Bad Idea? | BenchFly Blog

    wrote on May 19, 2010 at 6:46 pm

    […] Isn’t Reviewing Papers My Boss’ Job? […]

  5. The Lab Budget's in More Red than a Friday the 13th Movie | BenchFly Blog

    wrote on June 9, 2010 at 9:08 am

    […] Isn’t Reviewing Papers My Boss’ Job? […]

  6. Changing Thesis Projects: Death Sentence or New Life? | BenchFly Blog - Advice for Your Life in Science

    wrote on June 23, 2010 at 5:48 am

    […] Isn’t Reviewing Papers My Boss’ Job? […]

  7. Working for a Micromanager is a Macro Pain | BenchFly Blog

    wrote on July 9, 2010 at 9:06 am

    […] Isn’t Reviewing Papers My Boss’ Job? […]

  8. Is a Lab Holiday Party too Much to Ask For?! | BenchFly Blog

    wrote on August 16, 2010 at 5:26 pm

    […] Isn’t Reviewing Papers My Boss’ Job? […]

  9. Dear Dora: Finding a Job and Managing Your Boss | BenchFly Blog

    wrote on August 16, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    […] Isn’t Reviewing Papers My Boss’ Job? […]

  10. Dear Dora: Stealing, Guts and Deceit | BenchFly Blog

    wrote on August 16, 2010 at 8:47 pm

    […] Isn’t Reviewing Papers My Boss’ Job? […]

  11. Dear Boss: Time to Trust Me (or Bust Me) | BenchFly Blog

    wrote on August 20, 2010 at 5:36 am

    […] Isn’t Reviewing Papers My Boss’ Job? […]

  12. Dear Dora: Ethical Dilemmas, Micromanagers and Evil Email | BenchFly Blog

    wrote on October 12, 2010 at 5:14 pm

    […] Isn’t Reviewing Papers My Boss’ Job? […]

  13. Stressed science

    wrote on March 12, 2011 at 12:57 pm

    Dear Dora,

    We have a two months project. It is basically in bioinformatics hence if we worked real hard and got good results. Throughout my project my supervisor never met me and ignored me. He came ten days before the completion of te project and started scolding me. I have to put my work in thesis. The entire project was my idea and my hardwork. A doctorel scholar helped me with my work. I want to put his name and kick out my supervisor’s name from the paper which i am going to publish. Can i do that?

  14. Dora

    wrote on March 16, 2011 at 12:45 pm

    Dear Stressed science,

    Unfortunately, you cannot publish your papers without your supervisor’s permission, because they funded your research and hence, they own the data. In fact, the doctoral scholar will need to put his supervisor's name on it too (assuming it is a different supervisor). In summary anyone who made a major contribution to the paper (eg. funding, lab space, computers, and intellectual) has to be an author.

Leave a comment

will not be published